| Pages: [1] |
1. need for 400,000 m3 general hauler. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mike Voidstar wrote: Hauling stuff isn't some hyper specialized ship function. It's one of the most basic things a ship does. It's worth its own T1 line-up. Why should moving loads bigger than a bread box always require billion+ ISK ships? Ser...
- by Media freak - at 2015.09.08 22:04:41
|
2. need for 400,000 m3 general hauler. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Reaver Glitterstim wrote: Media freak wrote: The T2 being it specializing into hauling instead of combat. That doesn't make a lick of sense. There are T1 haulers in the game. and these would be battle cruisers or battleships that are s...
- by Media freak - at 2015.09.08 20:35:23
|
3. need for 400,000 m3 general hauler. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This sounds like it should be a T2 battlecruiser or battleship. The T2 being it specializing into hauling instead of combat. With the price reflecting appox what the other T2 of that class are going for. Or its another T2 line of freighter where...
- by Media freak - at 2015.09.08 05:50:47
|
4. need for 400,000 m3 general hauler. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Maldiro Selkurk wrote: there is a huge gap in the hauler line up, a hauler with 400,000 m3 cargo capacity a would fill that gap. it would be nice if you could fit for hauling capacity vs tank with 400,000 m3 being the hauling fit and maybe 250,...
- by Media freak - at 2015.09.03 20:04:40
|
5. Sticky:[Galatea] First batch of sov capture iterations - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Media freak wrote: Sgt Ocker wrote: PS; Your insistence highsec is safer than your protected little pocket of sov, is just such a clear indication - We aren't playing the same game. (although, if you were to go to highsec ...
- by Media freak - at 2015.09.02 16:51:56
|
6. Sticky:[Galatea] First batch of sov capture iterations - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: PS; Your insistence highsec is safer than your protected little pocket of sov, is just such a clear indication - We aren't playing the same game. (although, if you were to go to highsec right now, you would be safe - there are...
- by Media freak - at 2015.09.02 07:39:13
|
7. EVE 4K Issue - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
O2 jayjay wrote: NekoKitten wrote: I'm using an iiyama 29 inch 4K screen with one GTX970, works brilliantly. I usually set the GUI to 125%, so I can fit 2 eve windows next to each other ^_^ 55 inch @ 5m would be an eye strain I bet. See...
- by Media freak - at 2015.09.01 23:27:29
|
8. [Future] Module Tiericide GÇô Shield Rechargers and Others - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Estella Osoka wrote: Since when is using a Lach as heavy tackle not using it's strengths? Last I checked it got a bonus to range on Warp Scram and Disrupters. since he was trying to make a point. I mean that scram is only tackling things at...
- by Media freak - at 2015.09.01 21:25:45
|
9. [Future] Module Tiericide GÇô Shield Rechargers and Others - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Brokk Witgenstein wrote: Your point? Fail lachesis is supposed to convince me of anything? Edit: "fail" in the sense that your Recon is supposed to fit EWAR / bonused points. Yours does not. Obviously you have free mids under those circumsta...
- by Media freak - at 2015.08.30 15:28:17
|
10. Sticky:[Galatea] First batch of sov capture iterations - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Harry Saq wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: This whole 'discussion' is a replay of Dominion, people were RABID in their support of Dominion in the beginning, like some (like Harry) are about Aegis. i think this is mainly due to 2 factors, utter disli...
- by Media freak - at 2015.08.28 22:09:28
|
11. Sticky:[Galatea] First batch of sov capture iterations - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Harry Saq wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: Harry Saq wrote: Negative sir, you miss the point again...and I am sorry that you can't read. What I am doing is called analysis of reality, I believe you brought the prejudice. Try looking at it from a ...
- by Media freak - at 2015.08.28 17:39:54
|
12. Sticky:[Winter] Missile Rebalance + Hurricane tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Faora Zod wrote: Bouh Revetoile wrote: Faora Zod wrote: Onictus wrote: Faora Zod wrote: Has any one brought up the reload time? Missile Launchers take 10 seconds, while guns take 5 not to mention the instant swap for lens. Also i...
- by Media freak - at 2012.10.27 17:15:00
|
13. Substantially decrease the mineral needs of BP's? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: 10mn Microwarp drive Capacitor bonus Meta 0 25% Meta 3 19% T2 17% 19% cap bonus makes it the most desireable module, over both the player built versions. Didn't read the rest the that Capacitor bonus is a ne...
- by Media freak - at 2012.10.27 05:43:00
|
14. Substantially decrease the mineral needs of BP's? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Natsett Amuinn wrote: Herr Hammer Draken wrote: Then do not build that small handful of items that are that way. You are this bent out of shape over a small hand full of items? When you are making isk on over 200 items that do sell? I do ...
- by Media freak - at 2012.10.26 07:18:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |